Suppose VV and WW are finite-dimensional and that UU is a subspace of VV.
Prove that there exists T∈L(V,W)T \in \mathcal L(V, W) such that null T=U\text{null }T = U if and only if dim⁡U≥dim⁡V−dim⁡W\dim U \ge \dim V - \dim W.


Let v1,…,vrv_1,\dots,v_r be a basis for UU and define Tvj=0Tv_j = 0 for all 1≤j≤r1 \le j \le r, we now have U=null TU = \text{null }T and would like to finish definining TT without adding anything to the nullspace.
Extend v1,…,vrv_1,\dots,v_r to a basis v1,…,vnv_1,\dots,v_n of VV using 2.33 and let w1,…,wmw_1,\dots,w_m be a basis of WW.

I'd like to define Tvj+r=wjTv_{j+r} = w_j for the rest of the vjv_j's, but this requires m≥n−rm \ge n-r so that WW has room for n−rn-r independent vectors. Rearranging our condition gives r≥n−mr \ge n-m which is just

dim⁡U≥dim⁡V−dim⁡W\dim U \ge \dim V - \dim W

This completes the forward direction.

To see null T=U\text{null }T = U is impossible when dim⁡U<dim⁡V−dim⁡W\dim U < \dim V - \dim W we simply apply 3.22

dim⁡V=dim⁡null T+dim⁡range T=dim⁡U+dim⁡range T<dim⁡V−dim⁡W+dim⁡range T\begin{aligned} \dim V &= \dim \text{null } T + \dim \text{range }T \\ &= \dim U + \dim \text{range }T \\ &< \dim V - \dim W + \dim \text{range }T \end{aligned}

Which implies dim⁡W<dim⁡range T\dim W < \dim \text{range }T which is impossible since range T\text{range }T is a subspace of WW.
This completes the backward direction.